Triple

T975624
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Skinner box E21045 entity
Predicate developedInField P22747 FINISHED
Object radical behaviorism LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: radical behaviorism | Statement: [Skinner box, developedInField, radical behaviorism]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: developedInField
Context triple: [Skinner box, developedInField, radical behaviorism]
  • A. developedWith
    Indicates that something was created, built, or produced using a specified tool, technology, method, or collaborator.
  • B. developedUnder
    Indicates that something was created, produced, or brought into existence while being subject to the authority, guidance, or conditions imposed by a particular person, organization, regime, or framework.
  • C. developedAs
    Indicates that one entity was created, designed, or evolved specifically to function as or replace another entity.
  • D. developedThrough
    Indicates that something came into existence, was created, or was brought to its current form by means of a specified process, method, or developmental pathway.
  • E. developedInCase
    Indicates that something (such as a method, argument, or principle) was formulated, articulated, or established within the context of a particular case.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493c2b62c8190b616351789ec47f8 completed March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4b46234c88190b2bfc9cafe59d7f7 completed March 1, 2026, 9:49 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4b2a6aa2c8190aebba71320ab678f completed March 1, 2026, 9:41 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4b38630848190bd3898a4f42018ad completed March 1, 2026, 9:45 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:40 p.m.