Triple
T9743268
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gravity Probe B |
E236241
|
entity |
| Predicate | gyroscopeTechnology |
P6774
|
FINISHED |
| Object | superconducting gyroscopes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: superconducting gyroscopes | Statement: [Gravity Probe B, gyroscopeTechnology, superconducting gyroscopes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: gyroscopeTechnology Context triple: [Gravity Probe B, gyroscopeTechnology, superconducting gyroscopes]
-
A.
gimbalCapability
Indicates the ability of a system or device to support and control a gimbal’s movement or stabilization functions.
-
B.
hasNavigationTechnology
Indicates that an entity is equipped with or utilizes a system or technology for determining or guiding its position, route, or movement.
-
C.
technologicalFeature
chosen
Indicates that one entity possesses, exhibits, or is characterized by a specific technological capability, component, or functionality in relation to another entity.
-
D.
envisionedTechnology
Indicates that an entity has imagined, conceptualized, or planned a particular technology, typically before it exists or is realized.
-
E.
cameraTechnology
Indicates the type or characteristics of camera-related technology associated with an entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84d3e24481908a476e2231123cf9 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd9f2e5bb081908047e3bf5fe3991c |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd03cc128c81908b84ef224f858b4e |
completed | April 1, 2026, 11:38 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:23 p.m.