Triple
T9715455
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Summit County, Utah |
E235130
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Samak, Utah |
E778508
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Samak, Utah | Statement: [Summit County, Utah, contains, Samak, Utah]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Samak, Utah Context triple: [Summit County, Utah, contains, Samak, Utah]
-
A.
Kamas, Utah
chosen
Kamas, Utah is a small city in northeastern Utah known as a gateway to the Uinta Mountains and nearby outdoor recreation areas.
-
B.
Lynndyl, Utah
Lynndyl, Utah is a small rural town in central Utah known for its agricultural surroundings and proximity to major rail lines.
-
C.
Paragonah, Utah
Paragonah, Utah is a small rural town in southwestern Utah known for its agricultural roots and proximity to outdoor recreation areas near the western edge of the Colorado Plateau.
-
D.
Genola, Utah
Genola, Utah is a small rural town in central Utah known for its agricultural character and proximity to the communities of Utah County.
-
E.
Mt. Pleasant, Utah
Mt. Pleasant, Utah is a small historic city in central Utah known for its pioneer-era architecture and rural, agricultural character.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84cd8fa0819090a5e243ceb37003 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd9e0bb82081908e21a646f4de1a61 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:36 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d19f941b908190a3e27f4b6c1b3535 |
completed | April 4, 2026, 11:32 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:20 p.m.