Triple
T9696603
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Supreme Court of the United Kingdom |
E234668
|
entity |
| Predicate | notHighestCourtFor |
P74299
|
FINISHED |
| Object | criminal cases in Scotland |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: criminal cases in Scotland | Statement: [Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, notHighestCourtFor, criminal cases in Scotland]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notHighestCourtFor Context triple: [Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, notHighestCourtFor, criminal cases in Scotland]
-
A.
hasLowerCourt
Indicates that one court functions as a subordinate or inferior court within the judicial hierarchy of another court.
-
B.
notCourtOfRecord
Indicates that the referenced court does not maintain a permanent, formal record of its proceedings and decisions.
-
C.
secondHighestCourt
chosen
Indicates that one court is ranked immediately below the highest court within a given judicial hierarchy or jurisdiction.
-
D.
highestCourtOf
Indicates that one entity is the supreme judicial authority or top-level court within the jurisdiction or legal system of another entity.
-
E.
highestCourtOfAppealFor
Indicates that one entity serves as the ultimate judicial authority to which decisions from the other entity can be appealed.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84cb580c8190a7e5f4b3bcdaf2a4 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd9d3a88788190a4235a1ab33341ec |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:33 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ccd5b9e93c8190947cce56a3925364 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:22 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:18 p.m.