Triple
T9694793
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bojinka plot |
E234619
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalOutcomeForPerpetrator |
P2931
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ramzi Yousef convicted in U.S. federal court |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ramzi Yousef convicted in U.S. federal court | Statement: [Bojinka plot, legalOutcomeForPerpetrator, Ramzi Yousef convicted in U.S. federal court]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalOutcomeForPerpetrator Context triple: [Bojinka plot, legalOutcomeForPerpetrator, Ramzi Yousef convicted in U.S. federal court]
-
A.
perpetratorStatus
Indicates the role or condition of an individual in relation to committing or being responsible for a specific harmful or criminal act.
-
B.
perpetratorTrial
Indicates that a legal trial is conducted to judge the actions or guilt of the identified perpetrator.
-
C.
perpetratorTrialHeldBy
Indicates that a legal trial concerning the perpetrator is conducted or overseen by the specified judicial body or authority.
-
D.
hasPerpetratorStatement
Indicates that a statement has been made by the perpetrator regarding the related event or action.
-
E.
legalOutcome
chosen
Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84cb580c8190a7e5f4b3bcdaf2a4 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd9d348868819083aec7a5da8c455b |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:33 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ccd5b840f081909f66bf0b66d17d9b |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:22 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:17 p.m.