Triple

T968163
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Shema Yisrael E20882 entity
Predicate containsCommand P22505 FINISHED
Object love of God LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: love of God | Statement: [Shema Yisrael, containsCommand, love of God]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: containsCommand
Context triple: [Shema Yisrael, containsCommand, love of God]
  • A. hasCommand
    Indicates that one entity possesses, controls, or is associated with a specific command or directive applied to another entity or process.
  • B. hasComponentCommand
    Indicates that an entity includes or controls another entity as a subordinate or component command within an organizational or command structure.
  • C. supportsCommand
    Indicates that one entity is capable of recognizing, accepting, or executing a specified command associated with another entity.
  • D. hasCommandStructure
    Indicates that one entity possesses an organized hierarchy of authority or control that governs another entity or set of entities.
  • E. hasSubordinateCommand
    Indicates that one command or unit holds authority over and directs the operations of another command or unit that is subordinate to it.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493b33d2c81909c52c369d3ca8436 completed March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4b43549008190a4d65efdc3bda520 completed March 1, 2026, 9:48 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4b2a579888190afb489ac9fe8391c completed March 1, 2026, 9:41 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4b385176081909e3e8c3f647c1fd4 completed March 1, 2026, 9:45 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:40 p.m.