Triple
T9680278
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Southern Alberta |
E234261
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMajorCity |
P316
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Calgary |
E23062
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Calgary | Statement: [Southern Alberta, hasMajorCity, Calgary]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Calgary Context triple: [Southern Alberta, hasMajorCity, Calgary]
-
A.
Calgary
Calgary is a small coastal village on the Isle of Mull in Scotland, known for its scenic white-sand beach and surrounding natural beauty.
-
B.
Calgary
chosen
Calgary is a major city in the province of Alberta, Canada, known for its oil and gas industry, proximity to the Rocky Mountains, and the annual Calgary Stampede.
-
C.
Edmonton
Edmonton is the capital city of the Canadian province of Alberta, known for its major role in the energy sector and its extensive river valley park system.
-
D.
Edmonton
Edmonton is a historic suburban area in the London Borough of Enfield, formerly part of the county of Middlesex in England.
-
E.
Lethbridge
Lethbridge is a mid-sized city in southern Alberta, Canada, known for its coulee landscapes, windy climate, and role as a regional commercial and educational hub.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84c99e34819092e5563a7106cfca |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd9c9dcbe881908ae926a5b5eae759 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:30 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d18a395a508190a185d08f3719ee09 |
completed | April 4, 2026, 10:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:16 p.m.