Triple
T9680123
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Electric Arguments |
E234257
|
entity |
| Predicate | containsImprovisation |
P63181
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Electric Arguments, containsImprovisation, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: containsImprovisation Context triple: [Electric Arguments, containsImprovisation, true]
-
A.
hasImprovisation
chosen
Indicates that an entity includes, involves, or is characterized by improvisational elements or unscripted creative actions in relation to another entity or context.
-
B.
hasImprovisationStyle
Indicates that an entity exhibits or is associated with a particular style or manner of improvisation.
-
C.
hasImprovisedSoloBy
Indicates that an improvised solo performance is attributed to or performed by a specific entity.
-
D.
isFrequentlyImprovisedOver
Indicates that one thing commonly serves as the underlying basis or structure over which improvisation is often performed.
-
E.
reasonForImprovisation
Indicates that one event, condition, or factor serves as the cause or motivation for an improvisational action or behavior.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84c99e34819092e5563a7106cfca |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd9c9dcbe881908ae926a5b5eae759 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:30 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ccd5b5d40c8190850ad7a351445f32 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:22 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:16 p.m.