Triple
T9668708
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RFC 2574 |
E233770
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedTo |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RFC 2572 |
E197566
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 2572 | Statement: [RFC 2574, relatedTo, RFC 2572]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 2572 Context triple: [RFC 2574, relatedTo, RFC 2572]
-
A.
RFC 2572
chosen
RFC 2572 is an earlier IETF specification that defined the Message Processing and Dispatching for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) before being superseded by RFC 3412.
-
B.
RFC 2573
RFC 2573 is an IETF standard that specifies the SNMPv3 applications, including command generator and responder, notification originator and receiver, and proxy forwarder functionality for network management.
-
C.
RFC 2575
RFC 2575 is an earlier IETF standard that defined the View-based Access Control Model (VACM) for SNMP before being superseded by RFC 3415.
-
D.
RFC 2595
RFC 2595 is an Internet standard that originally defined the use of TLS to secure email-related protocols such as IMAP, POP3, and ACAP.
-
E.
RFC 2574
RFC 2574 is an earlier IETF specification that defined the User-based Security Model (USM) for securing SNMPv3 communications before being superseded by RFC 3414.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca848d3b6c8190ae98ea554dea58df |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd9c3d5b3481908c8c66a3528875aa |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:29 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d190f691c8819093fe133bdbe1c9d1 |
completed | April 4, 2026, 10:30 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:15 p.m.