Triple

T9644007
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Articles 15 bis and 15 ter of the Rome Statute E233145 entity
Predicate interpretationGuidedBy P21759 FINISHED
Object Elements of Crimes for the crime of aggression E320399 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Elements of Crimes for the crime of aggression | Statement: [Articles 15 bis and 15 ter of the Rome Statute, interpretationGuidedBy, Elements of Crimes for the crime of aggression]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Elements of Crimes for the crime of aggression
Context triple: [Articles 15 bis and 15 ter of the Rome Statute, interpretationGuidedBy, Elements of Crimes for the crime of aggression]
  • A. Elements of Crimes of the International Criminal Court chosen
    The Elements of Crimes of the International Criminal Court is an official legal instrument that clarifies and specifies the constituent elements of each crime under the ICC’s jurisdiction to guide interpretation, prosecution, and adjudication.
  • B. Resolution RC/Res.6 on the crime of aggression
    Resolution RC/Res.6 on the crime of aggression is a 2010 amendment to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court that defines the crime of aggression and sets out the conditions under which the Court may exercise jurisdiction over it.
  • C. Draft Articles on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes against Humanity
    The Draft Articles on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes against Humanity are a set of proposed international legal provisions developed to codify and strengthen states’ obligations to prevent, criminalize, and cooperate in prosecuting crimes against humanity.
  • D. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
    The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court is the foundational international treaty that established the ICC and defines its jurisdiction over genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression.
  • E. Part 2 of the Rome Statute
    Part 2 of the Rome Statute sets out the core international crimes under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court, including genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target predicate: interpretationGuidedBy
Context triple: [Articles 15 bis and 15 ter of the Rome Statute, interpretationGuidedBy, Elements of Crimes for the crime of aggression]
  • A. guidedBy
    Indicates that an entity’s actions, decisions, or movement are directed, advised, or led by another entity.
  • B. providesGuidanceTo
    Indicates that one entity offers direction, advice, or instruction to another entity.
  • C. intendedInterpretation
    Indicates that one entity is meant to be understood or interpreted in a particular way, sense, or meaning relative to another.
  • D. interpretationMethod chosen
    Indicates the method, technique, or process used to interpret or derive meaning from something.
  • E. historicallyInterpretedBy
    Indicates that something (such as an event, text, or phenomenon) has been given meaning, explanation, or understanding by a particular historian, group, or interpretive tradition over time.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca848a5a908190aad251f4137b0c3a completed March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cd9b7e2c488190b0f0dfa6d82618c8 completed April 1, 2026, 10:26 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69d18252c1cc81908d33c9c55d645fbf completed April 4, 2026, 9:27 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ccd5b0263081908cf6df3eb07d71b0 completed April 1, 2026, 8:22 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:12 p.m.