Triple

T9634570
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kapingamarangi E232895 entity
Predicate ethnoCulturalClassification P14216 FINISHED
Object Polynesian outlier LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Polynesian outlier | Statement: [Kapingamarangi, ethnoCulturalClassification, Polynesian outlier]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ethnoCulturalClassification
Context triple: [Kapingamarangi, ethnoCulturalClassification, Polynesian outlier]
  • A. ethnolinguisticGroups
    Indicates a relationship where groups are categorized or associated based on shared ethnic and linguistic characteristics.
  • B. ethnicCategoryIn chosen
    Indicates that an entity belongs to or is classified within a specified ethnic category in a given context.
  • C. ethnicGroupBase
    Indicates that one entity serves as the primary or foundational ethnic group from which another entity is derived, associated, or defined.
  • D. sharesEthnicity
    Indicates that two entities belong to the same ethnic group or share the same ethnic background.
  • E. ethnoLinguisticRegionOf
    Indicates that a region is defined or characterized by the shared ethnic and linguistic identity of the group associated with it.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca848940cc8190b97cec654cb3bb4a completed March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cd9b2a0e2c8190ab5aaa223b1e1cde completed April 1, 2026, 10:24 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ccd5acfa5c8190aaba3cf548723604 completed April 1, 2026, 8:22 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:11 p.m.