Triple
T9632779
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | HP-IL interface |
E232846
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsDeviceChaining |
P89366
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [HP-IL interface, supportsDeviceChaining, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsDeviceChaining Context triple: [HP-IL interface, supportsDeviceChaining, true]
-
A.
supportsADB
Indicates that one entity is capable of operating with, providing, or being compatible with Android Debug Bridge (ADB) functionality for another entity.
-
B.
supportsDeviceManagement
Indicates that one entity provides capabilities or functionality to manage, configure, or control another entity’s devices.
-
C.
usesDevice
Indicates that one entity operates, employs, or relies on a particular device to perform an action or achieve a purpose.
-
D.
testedDevice
Indicates that one entity has performed a test on, or experimentally evaluated, another entity as a device.
-
E.
requiresDevice
Indicates that performing the specified action or relationship is contingent on the presence or use of a particular device.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca848940cc8190b97cec654cb3bb4a |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd9b2783b48190a9929dc3e3cd2956 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:24 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ccd5acfa5c8190aaba3cf548723604 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:22 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ccd93fc45c8190a823305e461e581d |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:37 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:11 p.m.