Triple

T9632762
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Reverse Polish Notation E232845 entity
Predicate canBeConvertedFrom P14330 FINISHED
Object infix notation LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: infix notation | Statement: [Reverse Polish Notation, canBeConvertedFrom, infix notation]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canBeConvertedFrom
Context triple: [Reverse Polish Notation, canBeConvertedFrom, infix notation]
  • A. convertsFrom
    Indicates that one entity is transformed or changed into another entity, with the source being the starting form or state.
  • B. allowsConversionTo
    Indicates that one entity permits or enables transformation or change into another specified form or state.
  • C. convertsTo
    Indicates that one entity is transformed or changed into another entity, typically resulting in a different state, form, or representation.
  • D. acceptsConversionFrom chosen
    Indicates that one entity can validly receive or handle a conversion from another entity’s type, format, or representation.
  • E. isForcedToConvertTo
    Indicates that one entity is compelled, against its will, to change its beliefs, affiliation, or status to match that of another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca848940cc8190b97cec654cb3bb4a completed March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cd9b2783b48190a9929dc3e3cd2956 completed April 1, 2026, 10:24 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ccd5acfa5c8190aaba3cf548723604 completed April 1, 2026, 8:22 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:11 p.m.