Triple

T9620768
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India E232334 entity
Predicate benchType P23358 FINISHED
Object Constitution Bench
A Constitution Bench is a larger panel of at least five judges of the Supreme Court of India convened to decide cases involving substantial questions of constitutional interpretation.
E810174 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (4 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Constitution Bench | Statement: [Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India, benchType, Constitution Bench]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Constitution Bench
Context triple: [Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India, benchType, Constitution Bench]
  • A. Supreme Court of India
    The Supreme Court of India is the country’s highest judicial authority and final court of appeal, responsible for upholding the Constitution and interpreting national law.
  • B. Real y Supremo Consejo de Indias
    Real y Supremo Consejo de Indias was the highest Spanish royal administrative and judicial body responsible for governing and overseeing Spain’s overseas territories in the Americas and Asia during the colonial period.
  • C. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
    Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala is a landmark 1973 Supreme Court of India judgment that established the basic structure doctrine, limiting Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution.
  • D. Constitutional Chamber
    The Constitutional Chamber is the specialized branch of Costa Rica’s Supreme Court responsible for interpreting the constitution and adjudicating constitutional and human rights issues.
  • E. I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab
    I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab is a landmark 1967 Indian Supreme Court case that held Parliament could not amend fundamental rights under the Constitution, sharply limiting its amending power until this view was later modified.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Constitution Bench
Triple: [Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India, benchType, Constitution Bench]
Generated description
A Constitution Bench is a larger panel of at least five judges of the Supreme Court of India convened to decide cases involving substantial questions of constitutional interpretation.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Constitution Bench
Target entity description: A Constitution Bench is a larger panel of at least five judges of the Supreme Court of India convened to decide cases involving substantial questions of constitutional interpretation.
  • A. Supreme Court of India
    The Supreme Court of India is the country’s highest judicial authority and final court of appeal, responsible for upholding the Constitution and interpreting national law.
  • B. Real y Supremo Consejo de Indias
    Real y Supremo Consejo de Indias was the highest Spanish royal administrative and judicial body responsible for governing and overseeing Spain’s overseas territories in the Americas and Asia during the colonial period.
  • C. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
    Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala is a landmark 1973 Supreme Court of India judgment that established the basic structure doctrine, limiting Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution.
  • D. Constitutional Chamber
    The Constitutional Chamber is the specialized branch of Costa Rica’s Supreme Court responsible for interpreting the constitution and adjudicating constitutional and human rights issues.
  • E. I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab
    I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab is a landmark 1967 Indian Supreme Court case that held Parliament could not amend fundamental rights under the Constitution, sharply limiting its amending power until this view was later modified.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (5 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca84867bb88190b4b57dd5a56d5691 completed March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cd9ad3a8d88190b1414aa676d82f36 completed April 1, 2026, 10:23 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69d1796ced5c8190a3f275e03b481a96 completed April 4, 2026, 8:49 p.m.
NEDg Description generation batch_69d17a5df01081909f20c4a722cef83d completed April 4, 2026, 8:53 p.m.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) batch_69d17adb55648190b01060ade60b0fde completed April 4, 2026, 8:55 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:09 p.m.