Triple
T9618219
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Yakus v. United States |
E232271
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasFullCitation |
P17212
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Yakus v. United States, 321 U.S. 414 (1944) |
E232271
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Yakus v. United States, 321 U.S. 414 (1944) | Statement: [Yakus v. United States, hasFullCitation, Yakus v. United States, 321 U.S. 414 (1944)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Yakus v. United States, 321 U.S. 414 (1944) Context triple: [Yakus v. United States, hasFullCitation, Yakus v. United States, 321 U.S. 414 (1944)]
-
A.
Supreme Court case Yakus v. United States
chosen
Yakus v. United States is a 1944 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld wartime price controls and affirmed broad congressional delegation of authority to administrative agencies.
-
B.
Yasui v. United States
Yasui v. United States was a 1943 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the wartime conviction of Minoru Yasui for violating a military-imposed curfew on Japanese Americans, thereby affirming the government’s authority to restrict their civil liberties during World War II.
-
C.
Yates v. United States
Yates v. United States is a 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the application of the Smith Act by distinguishing between the advocacy of abstract doctrine and the advocacy of concrete action to overthrow the government.
-
D.
Wright v. United States
Wright v. United States is a 1938 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the scope of presidential veto power and the constitutional requirements for lawmaking under the Presentment Clause.
-
E.
Herring v. United States
Herring v. United States is a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court case that further limited the application of the exclusionary rule by holding that evidence need not be suppressed when obtained through isolated police negligence rather than deliberate or reckless misconduct.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84867bb88190b4b57dd5a56d5691 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd9ab0a15481908945b50c622b71b9 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:22 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d17965cce08190862ea8a48addf0a2 |
completed | April 4, 2026, 8:49 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:09 p.m.