Triple
T9607460
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action (dissent on affirmative action) |
E232007
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Supreme Court judicial opinion dissent |
C4529
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Supreme Court judicial opinion dissent Context triple: [Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action (dissent on affirmative action), instanceOf, Supreme Court judicial opinion dissent]
-
A.
Supreme Court footnote
A Supreme Court footnote is a subordinate textual annotation in a Court opinion that provides clarification, limitation, or additional reasoning that can significantly influence the interpretation and scope of the decision.
-
B.
court decision
chosen
A court decision is a formal, authoritative ruling issued by a judicial body that resolves the legal issues in a case and may establish or apply legal precedent.
-
C.
United States Supreme Court brief
A United States Supreme Court brief is a formal written legal document submitted to the Court that presents a party’s arguments, relevant facts, and supporting authorities to persuade the Justices to rule in that party’s favor.
-
D.
dissenting academy
A dissenting academy is an educational institution, often outside the established church or state system, that provides alternative or nonconformist instruction in ideas, beliefs, or practices that challenge prevailing orthodoxies.
-
E.
advisory opinion
An advisory opinion is a formal, non-binding legal or expert judgment issued to clarify the interpretation or application of laws or policies in a specific context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8485a90c819094fe40b42fde9d70 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:08 p.m.