Triple
T9607450
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Utah v. Strieff |
E232006
|
entity |
| Predicate | sotomayorDissentCitation |
P89215
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Invoked writings by James Baldwin and Michelle Alexander to describe the consequences of the ruling. |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Invoked writings by James Baldwin and Michelle Alexander to describe the consequences of the ruling. | Statement: [Utah v. Strieff, sotomayorDissentCitation, Invoked writings by James Baldwin and Michelle Alexander to describe the consequences of the ruling.]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: sotomayorDissentCitation Context triple: [Utah v. Strieff, sotomayorDissentCitation, Invoked writings by James Baldwin and Michelle Alexander to describe the consequences of the ruling.]
-
A.
dissentingJustice
Indicates that a particular justice disagrees with the majority opinion or decision in a legal case.
-
B.
hasDissentingJustice
Indicates that within a judicial decision or ruling, there exists at least one justice who formally disagrees with the majority opinion.
-
C.
dissentingJusticesCount
Indicates the number of justices who formally disagreed with the majority opinion in a judicial decision.
-
D.
standardDiscussedInDissent
Indicates that a particular legal standard is examined or addressed within the dissenting opinion of a judicial decision.
-
E.
dissentingOpinionConcern
Indicates that one party holds a differing or opposing view and expresses concern or disagreement regarding another party’s position, decision, or statement.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8485a90c819094fe40b42fde9d70 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd9a62372881908bf21be91e7285fb |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:21 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ccd5a6fd2481908efd131e207b8143 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:21 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ccd93fc45c8190a823305e461e581d |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:37 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:08 p.m.