Triple
T9607411
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Utah v. Strieff |
E232006
|
entity |
| Predicate | fullName |
P16
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Utah v. Strieff, 579 U.S. 232 (2016) |
E232006
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Utah v. Strieff, 579 U.S. 232 (2016) | Statement: [Utah v. Strieff, fullName, Utah v. Strieff, 579 U.S. 232 (2016)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Utah v. Strieff, 579 U.S. 232 (2016) Context triple: [Utah v. Strieff, fullName, Utah v. Strieff, 579 U.S. 232 (2016)]
-
A.
Utah v. Strieff (dissent on Fourth Amendment rights)
chosen
Utah v. Strieff (dissent on Fourth Amendment rights) is a 2016 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court narrowed the exclusionary rule for evidence obtained after an unlawful stop, prompting a forceful dissent warning about the erosion of Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.
-
B.
Arizona v. Evans
Arizona v. Evans is a 1995 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule to evidence obtained through an arrest based on erroneous computer records.
-
C.
Oregon v. Elstad
Oregon v. Elstad is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that a suspect’s later, properly Mirandized confession can be admissible even if an earlier unwarned statement was obtained in violation of Miranda.
-
D.
Arizona v. Johnson
Arizona v. Johnson is a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified police authority to frisk passengers during lawful traffic stops when officers reasonably suspect they are armed and dangerous.
-
E.
Bucklew v. Precythe
Bucklew v. Precythe is a 2019 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld Missouri’s method of execution against an Eighth Amendment challenge, clarifying the standards for inmates claiming that a particular execution protocol would cause them severe pain.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8485a90c819094fe40b42fde9d70 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd9a62372881908bf21be91e7285fb |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:21 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d17942504481908e7147a0f56bdf96 |
completed | April 4, 2026, 8:49 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:08 p.m.