Triple

T9603591
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sir John Woodroffe E231911 entity
Predicate viewOnHinduism P89183 FINISHED
Object argued for the philosophical depth of Hinduism LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: argued for the philosophical depth of Hinduism | Statement: [Sir John Woodroffe, viewOnHinduism, argued for the philosophical depth of Hinduism]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: viewOnHinduism
Context triple: [Sir John Woodroffe, viewOnHinduism, argued for the philosophical depth of Hinduism]
  • A. viewOnBuddhism
    Indicates the stance, opinion, or perspective that an entity holds regarding Buddhism.
  • B. viewOnVedas
    Indicates the stance, opinion, or interpretive perspective that one entity holds regarding the Vedas.
  • C. viewOnGanesha
    Indicates a perspective, opinion, or belief that an entity holds regarding Ganesha.
  • D. viewOnDharma
    Indicates a relationship where an entity holds a particular perspective, interpretation, or stance regarding Dharma (moral or religious duty/principle).
  • E. viewInJainism
    Indicates the specific interpretation, significance, or doctrinal understanding of something within the context of Jainism.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca8484838c8190b2049199d22fef70 completed March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cd9a5cddf481909aa6b589bcb3e71a completed April 1, 2026, 10:21 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ccd5a6fd2481908efd131e207b8143 completed April 1, 2026, 8:21 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ccd93fc45c8190a823305e461e581d completed April 1, 2026, 8:37 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:08 p.m.