Triple
T9581879
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | OPC |
E231190
|
entity |
| Predicate | trinityDoctrine |
P15107
|
FINISHED |
| Object | affirms Nicene Trinitarianism |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: affirms Nicene Trinitarianism | Statement: [OPC, trinityDoctrine, affirms Nicene Trinitarianism]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: trinityDoctrine Context triple: [OPC, trinityDoctrine, affirms Nicene Trinitarianism]
-
A.
theologicalTradition
Indicates the religious or doctrinal school, lineage, or system of belief within which an entity’s theology is developed or practiced.
-
B.
doctrinalTheme
Indicates that one entity concerns, expresses, or is characterized by a particular doctrinal or theological theme in relation to another.
-
C.
doctrinalSignificance
Indicates the importance or impact that a doctrine or set of teachings has within a particular religious, legal, or ideological system.
-
D.
theologicalConcept
chosen
Indicates that something is a religious or theological idea, doctrine, or principle within a belief system.
-
E.
historicalDoctrine
Indicates that one entity embodies, represents, or is associated with a doctrine, teaching, or set of principles originating from a past historical context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca848161688190a68d514a0a9d5129 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd99cd59008190888eb11f00f61994 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:18 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ccd59fd7408190b36831902e3f37f7 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:21 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:05 p.m.