Triple
T9575673
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rusk County, Texas |
E231038
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Kilgore, Texas |
E497496
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Kilgore, Texas | Statement: [Rusk County, Texas, contains, Kilgore, Texas]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Kilgore, Texas Context triple: [Rusk County, Texas, contains, Kilgore, Texas]
-
A.
Kilgore, Texas
chosen
Kilgore, Texas is a small East Texas city historically known for its role in the East Texas Oil Field boom and its iconic oil derricks.
-
B.
Malakoff, Texas
Malakoff, Texas is a small city in East Texas known historically for its brick manufacturing and proximity to Cedar Creek Reservoir.
-
C.
McGregor, Texas
McGregor, Texas is a small Central Texas city known for its agricultural roots and proximity to Waco, as well as hosting aerospace and manufacturing facilities.
-
D.
Gilmer, Texas
Gilmer, Texas is a small East Texas city in Upshur County known for its rural character and annual East Texas Yamboree festival.
-
E.
Kaufman, Texas
Kaufman, Texas is a small city in northeastern Texas that serves as the administrative and commercial hub of Kaufman County.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca848091c48190bc313d6620d09555 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd99aa964c8190a50717edff30f10b |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:18 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d1614f33108190901e3037654c50ab |
completed | April 4, 2026, 7:06 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:05 p.m.