Triple

T9566890
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject CCS E230808 entity
Predicate typicalModel P2006 FINISHED
Object concurrent systems LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: concurrent systems | Statement: [CCS, typicalModel, concurrent systems]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalModel
Context triple: [CCS, typicalModel, concurrent systems]
  • A. typicalBase
    Indicates that one entity serves as the standard or most representative base or foundation for another entity in typical or common cases.
  • B. typicalIn
    Indicates that something commonly occurs, appears, or is found within a given context, category, or environment.
  • C. typicalCoreType
    Indicates that something is a standard or characteristic core type within a given classification or system.
  • D. possibleModel
    Indicates that one entity can serve as a potential or candidate model or template for another entity.
  • E. model chosen
    Indicates that one entity serves as a representation, example, or simulation of another entity or concept.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca847f22188190a56e4a97625bef22 completed March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cd996df4f08190b19bbaefb10a9789 completed April 1, 2026, 10:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ccd59b960c8190966a8870a2426bd5 completed April 1, 2026, 8:21 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:04 p.m.