Triple
T9558987
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mangaia |
E230620
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTraditionalPoliticalDivision |
P20121
|
FINISHED |
| Object | districts (puna) |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: districts (puna) | Statement: [Mangaia, hasTraditionalPoliticalDivision, districts (puna)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTraditionalPoliticalDivision Context triple: [Mangaia, hasTraditionalPoliticalDivision, districts (puna)]
-
A.
modernPoliticalDivisionIncludes
Indicates that a present-day political or administrative unit geographically contains another political or administrative unit.
-
B.
hasTraditionalCapital
Indicates that an entity serves or is recognized as the traditional or historical capital of another entity.
-
C.
historicallyDividedInto
chosen
Indicates that an entity was separated into multiple distinct parts or regions during a past historical period.
-
D.
hasHistoricTerritory
Indicates that an entity possesses or claims a territory that it historically occupied, controlled, or was associated with in the past.
-
E.
politicalDivision
Indicates that one entity is a governmental or administrative subdivision or jurisdiction within the territory or authority of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca847e53a88190a60eed7e02257f10 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd994a7e9c8190b68883c2ea45aa1a |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ccd594d0ac8190a81bc11a3a538167 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:21 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:03 p.m.