Triple

T955748
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Apple Park E20622 entity
Predicate designedCapacity P14460 FINISHED
Object approximately 12,000 employees LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: approximately 12,000 employees | Statement: [Apple Park, designedCapacity, approximately 12,000 employees]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: designedCapacity
Context triple: [Apple Park, designedCapacity, approximately 12,000 employees]
  • A. maximumCapacity chosen
    Indicates the greatest allowable or designed amount of something that an entity can hold, contain, or handle.
  • B. installedCapacity
    Indicates the maximum output or production capability that has been set up or built for a system, facility, or equipment, typically measured under specified conditions.
  • C. totalCapacity
    Indicates the maximum amount or volume that something can hold or accommodate in total.
  • D. approximateCapacity
    Indicates that one entity has an estimated or rough capacity value relative to another or to a specified measure.
  • E. laterCapacity
    Indicates that one entity’s capacity or capability occurs, becomes available, or is realized at a later time than another’s.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493b21f2881908132dcf45dcd2f36 completed March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4b3f7a7608190b8a8dd2486654bec completed March 1, 2026, 9:47 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4b2a18ecc8190883f6206fe3b0fb6 completed March 1, 2026, 9:41 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:40 p.m.