Triple
T9554372
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Prosecutor v. Jean Kambanda |
E230503
|
entity |
| Predicate | courtFinding |
P41134
|
FINISHED |
| Object | individual criminal responsibility for genocide |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: individual criminal responsibility for genocide | Statement: [Prosecutor v. Jean Kambanda, courtFinding, individual criminal responsibility for genocide]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: courtFinding Context triple: [Prosecutor v. Jean Kambanda, courtFinding, individual criminal responsibility for genocide]
-
A.
courtOrdered
Indicates that an action, condition, or relationship exists because it has been formally mandated or imposed by a court order.
-
B.
courtReview
Indicates that a court formally examines a decision, action, or case to determine its legality, correctness, or appropriateness.
-
C.
courtContext
Indicates the legal or judicial setting, circumstances, or framework within which a court-related action or relationship takes place.
-
D.
courtFeatured
Indicates that a particular court prominently presented, highlighted, or showcased a given entity (such as a case, event, or person) in an official or notable context.
-
E.
judgmentInvolves
chosen
Indicates that a particular judgment, decision, or legal ruling includes, concerns, or pertains to a specified entity or matter.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca847d3be8819099c9dad2a7e786f1 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd992412148190b092bd9918764d5f |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ccd594d0ac8190a81bc11a3a538167 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:21 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:03 p.m.