Triple
T9551018
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pearic languages |
E230420
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMember |
P10
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Chong language |
E783992
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Chong language | Statement: [Pearic languages, hasMember, Chong language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Chong language Context triple: [Pearic languages, hasMember, Chong language]
-
A.
Chewong language
chosen
The Chewong language is an indigenous Austroasiatic language spoken by the Chewong people of Peninsular Malaysia, known for its rich oral tradition and detailed vocabulary related to the forest environment.
-
B.
Changana language
Changana is a Bantu language spoken primarily in southern Mozambique and neighboring regions, closely related to other Tswa–Ronga varieties.
-
C.
Xong language
Xong language is a Hmong-Mien language spoken primarily by the Miao (Hmong) ethnic group in parts of southern China.
-
D.
Chumburung language
The Chumburung language is a Niger-Congo language spoken primarily by the Chumburung people in Ghana.
-
E.
Chocho language
The Chocho language is an indigenous Oto-Manguean language of central Mexico, traditionally spoken by the Chocho people in parts of Oaxaca.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca847d3be8819099c9dad2a7e786f1 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd991df7308190a56d95f195627513 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:15 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d14c85b9208190acf98fa985b0f01f |
completed | April 4, 2026, 5:38 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:02 p.m.