Triple
T9536974
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Trial Chambers (ICTR) |
E230041
|
entity |
| Predicate | personalJurisdiction |
P69548
|
FINISHED |
| Object | natural persons |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: natural persons | Statement: [Trial Chambers (ICTR), personalJurisdiction, natural persons]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: personalJurisdiction Context triple: [Trial Chambers (ICTR), personalJurisdiction, natural persons]
-
A.
legalJurisdiction
Indicates the legal authority or geographic area whose laws and courts have the power to govern, regulate, or adjudicate matters involving the related entities.
-
B.
intendedJurisdiction
Indicates the legal or geographic area over which something (such as a law, policy, or authority) is meant to have power or apply.
-
C.
definedJurisdictionOf
Indicates that one entity formally establishes or specifies the scope, boundaries, or authority of another entity’s jurisdiction.
-
D.
claimsJurisdictionOver
chosen
Indicates that one authority or governing body asserts legal power or control over a particular area, matter, or entity.
-
E.
laterLegalJurisdiction
Indicates that one legal jurisdiction succeeds or replaces another jurisdiction at a later point in time.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca847b1b3081908f72bc932c17cc41 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd98ce884c8190a8b3c2dc7c73c2c9 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:14 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cca56c44f88190a54a5d2a133bb07e |
completed | April 1, 2026, 4:56 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:01 p.m.