Triple
T9536959
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Trial Chambers (ICTR) |
E230041
|
entity |
| Predicate | appliesProceduralInstrument |
P61283
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ICTR Rules of Procedure and Evidence |
E805635
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ICTR Rules of Procedure and Evidence | Statement: [Trial Chambers (ICTR), appliesProceduralInstrument, ICTR Rules of Procedure and Evidence]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: ICTR Rules of Procedure and Evidence Context triple: [Trial Chambers (ICTR), appliesProceduralInstrument, ICTR Rules of Procedure and Evidence]
-
A.
Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the ICTR
chosen
The Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the ICTR are the comprehensive legal framework governing how the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda conducts its investigations, trials, and appeals in prosecuting genocide and other serious violations of international humanitarian law.
-
B.
Registry of the ICTR
The Registry of the ICTR is the administrative organ of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda responsible for providing legal, logistical, and support services to its judicial chambers and prosecution.
-
C.
ICTR Statute
The ICTR Statute is the founding legal instrument that established the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and defined its jurisdiction, structure, and applicable law for prosecuting serious violations of international humanitarian law committed in Rwanda in 1994.
-
D.
Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the International Criminal Court
The Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the International Criminal Court are a comprehensive legal framework that governs how the Court conducts its investigations, trials, and appeals, detailing the rights of participants and the handling of evidence in cases of international crimes.
-
E.
Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda
The Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda is the foundational legal instrument established by the UN Security Council that defines the Tribunal’s jurisdiction, structure, and substantive and procedural rules for prosecuting those responsible for the 1994 Rwandan genocide and related serious violations of international humanitarian law.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appliesProceduralInstrument Context triple: [Trial Chambers (ICTR), appliesProceduralInstrument, ICTR Rules of Procedure and Evidence]
-
A.
hasProceduralInstrument
chosen
Indicates that a procedure or process is carried out using, or with the aid of, a specified instrument or tool.
-
B.
alsoAppliesInstrument
Indicates that a condition, rule, or characteristic that applies to one instrument also applies to another instrument.
-
C.
mainInstrumentalProducer
Indicates that one entity serves as the primary producer responsible for the instrumental (non-vocal) component of another entity, such as a song or recording.
-
D.
usesInstrument
Indicates that an agent performs an action by employing a specific instrument or tool as the means to carry it out.
-
E.
coreInstrument
Indicates that an instrument plays a central or primary role in performing an action or achieving an outcome.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca847b1b3081908f72bc932c17cc41 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd98ce884c8190a8b3c2dc7c73c2c9 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:14 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d15278efd4819091e707aabd9a59d7 |
completed | April 4, 2026, 6:03 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cca56c44f88190a54a5d2a133bb07e |
completed | April 1, 2026, 4:56 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:01 p.m.