Triple
T9536179
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mack Attack |
E230019
|
entity |
| Predicate | inningOfKeyComeback |
P88598
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 7th inning |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 7th inning | Statement: [Mack Attack, inningOfKeyComeback, 7th inning]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: inningOfKeyComeback Context triple: [Mack Attack, inningOfKeyComeback, 7th inning]
-
A.
comebackContext
Indicates the situational background, circumstances, or prior events that frame or motivate a comeback or return.
-
B.
comebackSingleFor
Indicates that a particular single serves as a comeback release for an artist or group, marking their return after a hiatus or previous work.
-
C.
comebackWorkFor
Indicates that an entity returns to a previous workplace or employer to work again.
-
D.
comebackAlbumFor
Indicates that one album serves as an artist’s return or resurgence release following a period of inactivity, decline, or absence.
-
E.
regainedPowerAgainIn
Indicates that an entity, having previously lost power, has once more returned to a position of power or control within a specified context or location.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca847b1b3081908f72bc932c17cc41 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd98cd6a5c8190835c0910ec38ede3 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:14 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cca56c44f88190a54a5d2a133bb07e |
completed | April 1, 2026, 4:56 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cca89f1d748190bf3636bea28d8a37 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 5:09 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8 p.m.