Triple

T9535380
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Demetrius E230000 entity
Predicate commendedBy P88588 FINISHED
Object author of 3 John LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: author of 3 John | Statement: [Demetrius, commendedBy, author of 3 John]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: commendedBy
Context triple: [Demetrius, commendedBy, author of 3 John]
  • A. commendedFor
    Indicates that one entity has expressed praise or approval toward another entity specifically because of a particular action, quality, or achievement.
  • B. recommendedIn
    Indicates that one entity is suggested or endorsed within the context, content, or scope of another entity (such as a document, list, or recommendation source).
  • C. implementsRecommendationOf
    Indicates that one entity carries out or puts into practice a recommendation that was proposed or issued by another entity.
  • D. submitsRecommendationsTo
    Indicates that one entity formally sends or presents recommendations to another entity for consideration or action.
  • E. madeRecommendation
    Indicates that one entity has suggested or advised another entity to consider a particular option, action, or choice.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca847b1b3081908f72bc932c17cc41 completed March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cd98cc58bc8190ba921410e4b64aaa completed April 1, 2026, 10:14 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cca56c44f88190a54a5d2a133bb07e completed April 1, 2026, 4:56 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cca89f1d748190bf3636bea28d8a37 completed April 1, 2026, 5:09 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8 p.m.