Triple
T9531037
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Conroy, Iowa |
E229893
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasName |
P744
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Conroy, Iowa |
E229893
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Conroy, Iowa | Statement: [Conroy, Iowa, hasName, Conroy, Iowa]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Conroy, Iowa Context triple: [Conroy, Iowa, hasName, Conroy, Iowa]
-
A.
Conroy, Iowa
chosen
Conroy, Iowa is a small unincorporated community located in Iowa County in the U.S. state of Iowa.
-
B.
Corning, Iowa
Corning, Iowa is a small city in southwestern Iowa known as the administrative and commercial center of Adams County.
-
C.
Onslow, Iowa
Onslow, Iowa is a small rural city located in Jones County in eastern Iowa, known for its close-knit community and agricultural surroundings.
-
D.
Ocheyedan, Iowa
Ocheyedan, Iowa is a small rural city in northwestern Iowa known for its agricultural surroundings and proximity to the Ocheyedan Mound, one of the state's notable natural landmarks.
-
E.
Mineola, Iowa
Mineola, Iowa is a small unincorporated rural community located in southwestern Iowa.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8479934c81908006d0e6e970ae05 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd98b408648190a04127c1d47fe7d2 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:14 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d14c38a3848190ab3561f70497c9eb |
completed | April 4, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8 p.m.