Triple
T9516729
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pope Hilarius |
E229543
|
entity |
| Predicate | strengthenedAuthorityOver |
P35765
|
FINISHED |
| Object | bishops in Gaul |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: bishops in Gaul | Statement: [Pope Hilarius, strengthenedAuthorityOver, bishops in Gaul]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: strengthenedAuthorityOver Context triple: [Pope Hilarius, strengthenedAuthorityOver, bishops in Gaul]
-
A.
strengthenedStatusOf
Indicates that the status, condition, or standing of one entity has been made stronger or more robust in relation to another entity or context.
-
B.
indicatesAuthorityOver
chosen
Indicates that one entity holds recognized power, control, or decision-making authority over another entity.
-
C.
usesAuthorityOf
Indicates that one entity exercises power, rights, or influence derived from or on behalf of another entity’s authority.
-
D.
reaffirmsAuthorityOf
Indicates that one entity confirms, strengthens, or restates the legitimacy or power of another entity’s authority.
-
E.
legalAuthorityOver
Indicates that one entity has the recognized power or right to make, enforce, or adjudicate rules or decisions concerning another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84777560819084cddd999badc1aa |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd987eefec8190b0db1928776bf02b |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cca56a3d088190bdc16670678fb6c6 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 4:56 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:58 p.m.