Triple
T9515533
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Common Gateway Interface |
E229514
|
entity |
| Predicate | limitation |
P99
|
FINISHED |
| Object | higher overhead compared to persistent application servers |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: higher overhead compared to persistent application servers | Statement: [Common Gateway Interface, limitation, higher overhead compared to persistent application servers]
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84777560819084cddd999badc1aa |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd986d5af08190a001c5a5ff647d4d |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:13 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:58 p.m.