Triple

T9502524
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sony α1 E229179 entity
Predicate effectiveResolution P33931 FINISHED
Object 50.1 megapixels LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 50.1 megapixels | Statement: [Sony α1, effectiveResolution, 50.1 megapixels]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: effectiveResolution
Context triple: [Sony α1, effectiveResolution, 50.1 megapixels]
  • A. hasResolution chosen
    Indicates that one entity possesses, specifies, or is associated with a particular level or type of resolution (such as detail, clarity, or granularity) in relation to another entity.
  • B. resolutionLeadsTo
    Indicates that achieving a particular resolution or decision directly brings about or causes a subsequent outcome or state.
  • C. resolution
    Indicates the act of formally deciding, settling, or expressing a determined stance on an issue, often through an official decision or statement.
  • D. targetResolution
    Indicates the specific resolution or level of detail that an action, process, or system is intended to achieve or operate at.
  • E. resolutionCommon
    Indicates that multiple entities share the same resolution or level of detail in a given context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca847611c48190a28c028644198c75 completed March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cd983ea6048190a2d7924c8e6d1fbc completed April 1, 2026, 10:12 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cca5651a588190a3cfebe249a223e5 completed April 1, 2026, 4:56 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:57 p.m.