Triple
T9502325
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Saharan languages |
E229173
|
entity |
| Predicate | majorLanguage |
P207
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Teda language |
E208969
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Teda language | Statement: [Saharan languages, majorLanguage, Teda language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Teda language Context triple: [Saharan languages, majorLanguage, Teda language]
-
A.
Teda language
chosen
The Teda language is a Saharan language spoken primarily by the Teda (northern Toubou) people of the Tibesti region in Chad and southern Libya.
-
B.
Tedaga language
The Tedaga language is a Saharan language spoken primarily by the Teda (Tubu) people of northern Chad and southern Libya.
-
C.
Opata language
The Opata language is an extinct Uto-Aztecan language once spoken by the Opata people of northern Mexico, particularly in the present-day state of Sonora.
-
D.
Tanema language
Tanema is a nearly extinct Oceanic language once spoken on Vanikoro Island in the Temotu Province of the Solomon Islands.
-
E.
Tiwa language
Tiwa language is a Tibeto-Burman language spoken by the Tiwa (Lalung) people of northeastern India, primarily in Assam and Meghalaya.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca847611c48190a28c028644198c75 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd983ea6048190a2d7924c8e6d1fbc |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:12 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d14c02de448190a2feea16d5461726 |
completed | April 4, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:57 p.m.