Triple

T9497095
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject WRQ E229035 entity
Predicate errorConditionsInclude P84224 FINISHED
Object access violation LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: access violation | Statement: [WRQ, errorConditionsInclude, access violation]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: errorConditionsInclude
Context triple: [WRQ, errorConditionsInclude, access violation]
  • A. containsCondition chosen
    Indicates that one entity includes, embodies, or is associated with a particular condition.
  • B. definesConditionsFor
    Indicates that one entity specifies or establishes the rules, requirements, or circumstances under which another entity is valid, applicable, or operates.
  • C. equalityCondition
    Indicates that two values, expressions, or attributes must be exactly the same for the condition to be satisfied.
  • D. evaluationCriteriaInclude
    Indicates that certain criteria are part of, or explicitly included in, the set of standards used to evaluate something.
  • E. captureCondition
    Indicates the specific circumstances or criteria under which a capture event or action is triggered or considered valid.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca84753660819098e8d416e89e26ae completed March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cd95ecf4148190aa8f4733980166ae completed April 1, 2026, 10:02 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cca5651a588190a3cfebe249a223e5 completed April 1, 2026, 4:56 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:56 p.m.