Triple
T9497051
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RRQ |
E229034
|
entity |
| Predicate | responseIfAccessViolation |
P88945
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ERROR packet from server |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ERROR packet from server | Statement: [RRQ, responseIfAccessViolation, ERROR packet from server]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: responseIfAccessViolation Context triple: [RRQ, responseIfAccessViolation, ERROR packet from server]
-
A.
accessRestrictedTo
Indicates that access to a resource, location, or information is limited exclusively to a specified entity or group under defined conditions.
-
B.
hasAccessException
Indicates that a usual access rule or restriction is overridden or exempted for a particular entity or situation.
-
C.
accessRestriction
Indicates a limitation or control placed on who or what can access a particular resource, location, or information.
-
D.
accessIs
Indicates that one entity has the ability, permission, or means to reach, use, or interact with another entity or resource.
-
E.
deniedAuthorityOf
Indicates that one entity refused to recognize, accept, or submit to the authority, power, or legitimacy of another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84753660819098e8d416e89e26ae |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd95ecf4148190aa8f4733980166ae |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:02 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cca5651a588190a3cfebe249a223e5 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 4:56 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cca8c6b0f081908334d6c7cf80e03c |
completed | April 1, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:56 p.m.