Triple

T9493398
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Acts of the Parliament of Australia E228945 entity
Predicate legalStatusAfterAssent P88929 FINISHED
Object legally binding LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: legally binding | Statement: [Acts of the Parliament of Australia, legalStatusAfterAssent, legally binding]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalStatusAfterAssent
Context triple: [Acts of the Parliament of Australia, legalStatusAfterAssent, legally binding]
  • A. legalStatusAfter1801
    Indicates the legal status or condition of an entity as it existed or was defined after the year 1801.
  • B. legalStatusAtIssue
    Indicates that the legal status of an entity is the central subject of dispute, consideration, or determination in a legal context.
  • C. legalStatusClarifiedBy
    Indicates that the legal status of something is defined, explained, or resolved by a specific document, decision, or authoritative act.
  • D. legalStatusAfter2009
    Indicates the legal status or condition that an entity holds from the year 2009 onward, typically reflecting changes due to laws or regulations taking effect at or after that time.
  • E. legalStatusAfter2005
    Indicates the legal status or condition that applies to an entity starting from the year 2005 onward.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca847424f081908180305555139f7a completed March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cd95e8c8908190950e1130f9612823 completed April 1, 2026, 10:02 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cca5651a588190a3cfebe249a223e5 completed April 1, 2026, 4:56 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cca8c6b0f081908334d6c7cf80e03c completed April 1, 2026, 5:10 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:56 p.m.