Triple

T9467235
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Covenant Chain E228300 entity
Predicate hasDiplomaticForm P88278 FINISHED
Object council meetings LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: council meetings | Statement: [Covenant Chain, hasDiplomaticForm, council meetings]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDiplomaticForm
Context triple: [Covenant Chain, hasDiplomaticForm, council meetings]
  • A. hasDiplomaticFormat
    Indicates that a diplomatic communication, document, or interaction follows a specific recognized diplomatic format or protocol.
  • B. hasDiplomaticLevel
    Indicates the degree or status of formal diplomatic relations that exists between two entities.
  • C. hasDiplomaticMission
    Indicates that one entity maintains an official diplomatic representation, such as an embassy or mission, in the territory or jurisdiction of another entity.
  • D. hasDiplomaticTheme
    Indicates that something involves or centers on diplomatic relations, negotiations, or international political interactions.
  • E. hasDiplomaticRankHead
    Indicates that an entity serving as a head (e.g., of a mission or organization) holds a specific diplomatic rank.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca846fee388190a6ec273fd644b88b completed March 30, 2026, 2:10 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cd7fdd7d048190930a15cb2a2d99ea completed April 1, 2026, 8:28 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cca55f01b081908dc0f12eaa45f832 completed April 1, 2026, 4:55 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cca89d0f0c8190b4528990fe708fca completed April 1, 2026, 5:09 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:53 p.m.