Triple
T9466999
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | People of the Flint |
E228295
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSymbolicMeaningOf |
P129
|
FINISHED |
| Object | strength |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: strength | Statement: [People of the Flint, hasSymbolicMeaningOf, strength]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSymbolicMeaningOf Context triple: [People of the Flint, hasSymbolicMeaningOf, strength]
-
A.
hasParticularSignificanceFor
Indicates that something holds a special, notable, or contextually important relevance or impact for a particular entity or situation.
-
B.
shapeSymbolism
Indicates how a particular shape is associated with or conveys symbolic meaning within a given context.
-
C.
symbolizes
chosen
Indicates that one entity stands for, represents, or is used as a sign for another entity, concept, or idea.
-
D.
emblemSymbolism
Indicates that one entity serves as an emblem whose design or features symbolically represent or convey meanings about another entity.
-
E.
hasIronicMeaning
Indicates that something conveys a meaning opposite to or incongruent with its literal expression, creating an ironic effect.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca846fee388190a6ec273fd644b88b |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd7fdd7d048190930a15cb2a2d99ea |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:28 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cca55f01b081908dc0f12eaa45f832 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 4:55 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:53 p.m.