Triple
T9456583
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Experimenta circa effectum conflictus electrici in acum magneticam |
E228028
|
entity |
| Predicate | yearOfDiscoveryReported |
P3631
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1820 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1820 | Statement: [Experimenta circa effectum conflictus electrici in acum magneticam, yearOfDiscoveryReported, 1820]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: yearOfDiscoveryReported Context triple: [Experimenta circa effectum conflictus electrici in acum magneticam, yearOfDiscoveryReported, 1820]
-
A.
discoveryDate
Indicates the date on which something was first discovered or identified.
-
B.
wasDiscoveredAt
Indicates that an entity was found, identified, or uncovered at a specific place or during a particular event or context.
-
C.
discoveryYear
chosen
Indicates the calendar year in which something was first discovered or identified.
-
D.
causeOfDiscovery
Indicates that one entity is the reason or factor that led to the discovery of another entity.
-
E.
rediscoveryYear
Indicates the year in which something that was previously known but lost, forgotten, or overlooked was found or recognized again.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca843b123881909b0e60028475d12d |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd7f8f7e1481909318e473ab4d6460 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cca5596ffc819097e9c8eefd4ef9b8 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 4:55 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:52 p.m.