Triple

T9442001
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cabinet des Dessins E227666 entity
Predicate typicalAccessPolicy P9584 FINISHED
Object viewing by appointment LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: viewing by appointment | Statement: [Cabinet des Dessins, typicalAccessPolicy, viewing by appointment]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalAccessPolicy
Context triple: [Cabinet des Dessins, typicalAccessPolicy, viewing by appointment]
  • A. typicalPolicyPreference
    Indicates that one entity’s policy preference is characteristic or representative of what is usually favored by another entity or group.
  • B. typeOfAccess
    Indicates the specific kind or level of access that one entity has to another (such as read, write, or execute permissions).
  • C. accessRestriction chosen
    Indicates a limitation or control placed on who or what can access a particular resource, location, or information.
  • D. eraPolicy
    Indicates that a specific policy was in effect during a particular historical or temporal era.
  • E. accessRole
    Indicates the specific permissions or level of authority an entity has when accessing another entity or resource.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca843884488190ad6cbe0153088234 completed March 30, 2026, 2:10 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cd7f300cc88190a793712706295c53 completed April 1, 2026, 8:25 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cca5596ffc819097e9c8eefd4ef9b8 completed April 1, 2026, 4:55 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:50 p.m.