Triple
T9410237
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | St Asaph |
E226685
|
entity |
| Predicate | locatedNear |
P294
|
FINISHED |
| Object | River Clwyd |
E321317
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: River Clwyd | Statement: [St Asaph, locatedNear, River Clwyd]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: River Clwyd Context triple: [St Asaph, locatedNear, River Clwyd]
-
A.
River Clwyd
chosen
River Clwyd is a river in northeast Wales that flows through Denbighshire to the Irish Sea near Rhyl.
-
B.
River Clywedog
River Clywedog is a small river in Wrexham County Borough, Wales, historically associated with local industry and the village of Bersham.
-
C.
River Ceiriog
River Ceiriog is a river in the border region between Wales and England, known for flowing through the Ceiriog Valley and past the town of Chirk.
-
D.
River Dyfi
The River Dyfi is a river in mid Wales that flows from the Cambrian Mountains to Cardigan Bay, forming part of the boundary between the historic counties of Montgomeryshire and Merionethshire.
-
E.
River Conwy
River Conwy is a river in north Wales known for flowing past the historic town of Conwy and its prominent medieval Conwy Castle.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca843280488190bc65600e843ef9e6 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd5255e4fc81908bf2f69c9a12ef83 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 5:13 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d11026b8688190b958ca65dae2d588 |
completed | April 4, 2026, 1:20 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:47 p.m.