Triple
T9406001
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gustaf Gründgens |
E226588
|
entity |
| Predicate | subjectOf |
P38
|
FINISHED |
| Object | legal case Mephisto decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court |
E36847
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: legal case Mephisto decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court | Statement: [Gustaf Gründgens, subjectOf, legal case Mephisto decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: legal case Mephisto decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court Context triple: [Gustaf Gründgens, subjectOf, legal case Mephisto decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court]
-
A.
Fiscal Court Code of Germany
The Fiscal Court Code of Germany is the central procedural statute governing how tax disputes are conducted and decided before German fiscal courts.
-
B.
Schorsch Meier GmbH v Hennin
Schorsch Meier GmbH v Hennin is a notable English contract law case, associated with Lord Denning, concerning the enforcement of foreign currency judgments and the impact of European Community law on domestic legal principles.
-
C.
Nazification of the German legal system
The Nazification of the German legal system was the systematic transformation of Germany’s courts, laws, and legal institutions into instruments of Nazi ideology and totalitarian control during the Third Reich.
-
D.
Bavarian constitutional court
The Bavarian Constitutional Court is the highest court in Bavaria responsible for reviewing the constitutionality of state laws and safeguarding the Bavarian state constitution.
-
E.
Federal Constitutional Court of Germany
chosen
The Federal Constitutional Court of Germany is the country's supreme constitutional authority, responsible for safeguarding the German constitution by reviewing laws, resolving constitutional disputes, and protecting fundamental rights.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca843280488190bc65600e843ef9e6 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd51c2b9bc81909a4ce91792294d1c |
completed | April 1, 2026, 5:11 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d1079bd644819081f9c8f25ff1c532 |
completed | April 4, 2026, 12:44 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:47 p.m.