Triple
T9404634
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Astrologer |
E226554
|
entity |
| Predicate | conditionForGift |
P69648
|
FINISHED |
| Object | future reward from the Tsar |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: future reward from the Tsar | Statement: [The Astrologer, conditionForGift, future reward from the Tsar]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: conditionForGift Context triple: [The Astrologer, conditionForGift, future reward from the Tsar]
-
A.
donationCondition
chosen
Indicates that a donation is subject to specific terms, requirements, or circumstances that must be met for it to occur or be valid.
-
B.
giftType
Indicates the specific category or kind of gift involved in the relationship or transaction.
-
C.
associatedWithGift
Indicates a relationship in which an entity is connected to, involved with, or linked through a gift.
-
D.
isPersonalGiftOf
Indicates that one entity is a gift personally given by another entity, typically reflecting a direct, individual act of giving.
-
E.
giftability
Indicates the degree to which something is suitable or appropriate to be given as a gift.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca843170f88190800a8ab2b5fc568e |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd51c125dc8190a6438cf0ee23e7a9 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 5:11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cca54c37f88190bddccf28e5fe5c84 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 4:55 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:46 p.m.