Triple
T9391436
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dangerous World Tour |
E226033
|
entity |
| Predicate | featuresSong |
P2152
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Will You Be There |
E682595
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Will You Be There | Statement: [Dangerous World Tour, featuresSong, Will You Be There]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Will You Be There Context triple: [Dangerous World Tour, featuresSong, Will You Be There]
-
A.
Will You Be There
chosen
"Will You Be There" is a soulful pop ballad by Michael Jackson that blends gospel influences with introspective lyrics about support and vulnerability.
-
B.
Say You'll Be There
"Say You'll Be There" is a 1996 pop song by the Spice Girls, known for its catchy melody, girl-power lyrics, and iconic desert-themed music video.
-
C.
I Will Be There
"I Will Be There" is a pop ballad by Britney Spears from her debut album ...Baby One More Time.
-
D.
I’ll Be There
"I’ll Be There" is a soulful track performed by Cissy Houston, featured on her self-titled album.
-
E.
I'll Be There
"I'll Be There" is a soulful 1970 ballad by The Jackson 5 that became one of their signature hits and a defining Motown classic.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca842f7e3481908bf5bcf52e032dbd |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd510eae0c8190b7c4ab487a366bb3 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 5:08 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d12ccfdf8c819092f2aa1ebe48ac83 |
completed | April 4, 2026, 3:22 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:45 p.m.