Triple
T9376141
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pyramid Song |
E225649
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasUnconventionalRhythm |
P51492
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Pyramid Song, hasUnconventionalRhythm, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasUnconventionalRhythm Context triple: [Pyramid Song, hasUnconventionalRhythm, yes]
-
A.
hasRhythmicStyle
Indicates that one entity exhibits or is characterized by a particular rhythmic pattern or style in its expression or behavior.
-
B.
hasOffbeatStyle
chosen
Indicates that an entity exhibits an unconventional, quirky, or nontraditional style or manner.
-
C.
hasNotableBeat
Indicates that an entity (such as a journalist or reporter) is professionally assigned to cover a specific topic, area, or subject as their primary reporting focus.
-
D.
hasRhythmicOrigin
Indicates that something originates from, is derived from, or is fundamentally based on rhythm or rhythmic patterns.
-
E.
hasRhythmOrigin
Indicates that one rhythm, style, or rhythmic pattern originates from, is derived from, or has its roots in another source.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca842d8ee88190aaaa639aa953185d |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd50aa3d008190836d0fde840da7d2 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 5:06 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc7a6c733881908aa3070830c2100b |
completed | April 1, 2026, 1:52 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:44 p.m.