Triple
T9335440
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Benelux armed forces |
E224631
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | defence cooperation arrangement |
C22718
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: defence cooperation arrangement Context triple: [Benelux armed forces, instanceOf, defence cooperation arrangement]
-
A.
collective defense agreement
A collective defense agreement is a formal pact among multiple states committing each to consider an attack on one member as an attack on all and to respond with coordinated defense measures.
-
B.
collective defense activity
A collective defense activity is a coordinated action undertaken by multiple individuals or groups to protect shared interests, resources, or members from perceived threats or harm.
-
C.
defense cost-sharing agreement
A defense cost-sharing agreement is a contractual arrangement in which two or more parties agree to allocate and reimburse expenses related to legal defense in connection with specified claims or proceedings.
-
D.
political-military alliance
chosen
A political-military alliance is a formal agreement between two or more states to coordinate their defense and foreign policies, often including mutual security guarantees and joint military planning.
-
E.
European Union security and defence policy instrument
A European Union security and defence policy instrument is a formal mechanism, tool, or framework established by the EU to plan, coordinate, and implement collective actions in the fields of security, crisis management, and defence.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84286fcc81909f6e7fd7a7e862a2 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:09 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:40 p.m.