Triple
T9330325
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Arthur Rankin Jr. |
E224502
|
entity |
| Predicate | familyName |
P18
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Rankin |
E686905
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Rankin | Statement: [Arthur Rankin Jr., familyName, Rankin]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Rankin Context triple: [Arthur Rankin Jr., familyName, Rankin]
-
A.
Rankin
chosen
Rankin is a surname of Scottish origin borne by various notable individuals across politics, law, the arts, and entertainment.
-
B.
Selkirk
Selkirk is a historic town in the Scottish Borders known for its legal heritage, including past judicial functions and associations with Scotland’s justice system.
-
C.
Kincorth
Kincorth is a residential area in the south of Aberdeen, Scotland, known for its post-war housing and proximity to the River Dee.
-
D.
Courtenay
Courtenay is a small city in the Comox Valley region of British Columbia, Canada, known for its outdoor recreation and proximity to mountains and ocean.
-
E.
Courtenay
Courtenay is a French noble family historically associated with the Capetian dynasty and known for producing figures such as Peter II of Courtenay, Latin Emperor of Constantinople.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8427a0c08190b749831d5ea98f02 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd37acbc04819092a67d7f392c74cd |
completed | April 1, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d0c7fca954819086f695be973b227e |
completed | April 4, 2026, 8:12 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:39 p.m.