Triple

T9322158
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Manila–Toronto E224293 entity
Predicate languageMajorityOrigin P11430 FINISHED
Object Filipino LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Filipino | Statement: [Manila–Toronto, languageMajorityOrigin, Filipino]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: languageMajorityOrigin
Context triple: [Manila–Toronto, languageMajorityOrigin, Filipino]
  • A. majorityLanguageOf chosen
    Indicates that a given language is the primary or most widely spoken language within a specified group, region, or entity.
  • B. languageFamilyDominant
    Indicates that one language family holds a primary or prevailing status over others within a given context (such as a region, population, or system).
  • C. languageOfFounders
    Indicates the language or languages spoken or used by the founders of an entity.
  • D. ethnicLanguageStatus
    Indicates the status or role of a language in relation to a particular ethnic group (e.g., primary, secondary, heritage, or minority language).
  • E. majorLanguageGroupOf
    Indicates that one language group is the primary or dominant linguistic classification to which another language or set of languages belongs.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca8426d48481909596360f7791c7dd completed March 30, 2026, 2:09 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cd36f2bd288190bb1556a88d9e90f3 completed April 1, 2026, 3:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc7a61e9a4819096eb014f3791ef2e completed April 1, 2026, 1:52 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:38 p.m.